|
Footpath
|
Issue/Date notified
|
Current status
|
Action required
|
|
2BR
|
Ridden horses don’t like using the bridle bridge and consider the approaches to the ford too steep. Date: prior 2007
|
Designs drawn up by Bridges team for modifying angle of approaches. Environment Agency has given their initial approval, but requires more information
|
Obtain further details and revised quotes from contractors.
|
|
|
Locked gate between these paths and county road (access possible via Kent carriage gap alongside Date: prior 2007
|
|
Continue negotiation:
|
|
|
Locked gate (access possible via stile alongside) Date: prior 2007
|
The old gate is still not secured back / removed.
|
Continue negotiation:
|
|
9FP
|
Crops not cleared wide enough
|
Cleared by harvest. Further complaint received Autumn 2007.
|
To be inspected.
|
|
9FP
|
Two waymark post collapsed, either side of pheasant cover. Date 22/9/07
|
Ordered for replacement.
|
|
|
10FP
|
Not reinstated after ploughing. Date 22/9/07
|
To be inspected.
|
To be inspected.
|
|
10FP
|
More waymark posts required. Date 22/9/07
|
To be inspected.
|
To be inspected.
|
|
|
Locked gate (access possible via kissing gate alongside) Date: prior 2007
|
The owner has pulled out of meetings and has involved the county councillor and indicated involving the MP. Last letter 25/3/08 requiring site meeting.
|
Continue negotiation:
|
|
|
Locked gate (access possible via gap alongside) Date: prior 2007
|
County Solicitors consulted. They require another land search. The initial part is back from land registry. Computer at Land Registry now needs to be checked as title numbers known.
|
Authorised person to access Update solicitors:
|
|
|
Two fence obstructions (access possible via permissive path) Date: prior 2007
|
The residents submitted new evidence that has been researched by Council. Site meeting arranged with residents for 27/3/08 where path is to be marked for them to clear voluntarily.
|
Continue-negotiation: 27/3/08 - site meeting concluded with Gilston residents voluntarily agreeing to open the path as indicated by RoW. They will be erecting a fence along the southern edge of the path for their security. They will be providing a timetable and consulting the planners with regards to the height.
|
|
20FP
|
Obstructed by broad beans Date 22/9/07
|
Path now cleared 2m + Resolved. Further complaint received Autumn 2007
|
To be inspected
|
|
20FP
|
More waymarks required. Date 22/9/07
|
To be inspected
|
To be inspected
|
|
27RB
|
Waymark post collapsed. Date 2/1/08
|
New post ordered.
|
|
|
32FP
|
Path flooded deeply every Winter. Date.26/11/07
|
Long stretch under many inches of water. Adjoining footpath 31 also affected.
|
Installing a boardwalk is only solution, but this would be very expensive. Currently applying for grants for this work. Considering using volunteer labour.
|
